Reproductive Slavery

Not my words..

From the Article

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/12/plan-b-for-all-girls-science-finally-trumps-politics/?intcmp=obinsite

Now don’t get me wrong here.. i have no issue with Plan B. I have no moral opposition to it on any religious grounds (hold up hand… Atheist!). Might it encourage promiscuity? Who knows.. i see it as no different than regular birth control that’s already available for kids. It’s just another option.

But here’s the real reason why this caught my eye. Slavery is an apt term. We educate kids about using birth control because duh duh duh.. kids being kids, will find a way to have sex. They are biologically programmed to do it. We might use knowledge, education or boogeyman scare tactics to dissuade them from having sex.. but it will happen.

The pill was created as a means to not make women become mothers before they were ready, before their time.

So i have no moral disagreement with Plan B.

I want to know where is the male version of Plan B.

I want to know where men go to avoid being slaves of reproduction.

And i want to hear something other then.. “Keep it in your pants”. Because i will punch you in the fucking face if you do.

The article frames it as it’s shown in the photo above, i have taken the liberty to modify it as how it’s actually intended to be interpreted by them:

“If a young girl is sexually active, whether by choice or not, she should not be denied reproductive rights. She should be allowed to make timely reproductive decisions about her own body within the dictates of her religious and moral codes.

To deny young adolescents GIRLS ONLY access to medically necessary and proven care is essentially reproductive slavery.”

We don’t want to make girls slaves to the responsibilities of their own choices to have sex.

But men who chose to have sex and accidentally knock a girl up…

It’s a lifetime of child support for you, now get cracking SLAVE!

RELATED:

The light at the end of the tunnel. Reproductive equality.

Once more with feeling re: Abortion

I don’t think women care that much about mens concerns

Fully aware of the exact nature of the proposed sexual activity

That’s the language used. This shall become VERY interesting.

I have new stuff coming soon, but i couldn’t let this one pass up. No time to make a detailed post, just my emphasis in bold. The plot thickens…

Link Here

[update:] now that i have a little extra time to devote to this, to any new readers of this post i want them to fixate on this particular comment

“..only gave her consent for protected sex with the intention to avoid conception, the court qualified Hutchinson’s actions as sexual assault.”

and then consider this, this and this after you’ve read the Yahoo post. Comments welcome.

…

Craig Jaret Hutchinson who poked holes in girlfriend’s condoms loses court appeal

When their relationship started to go sour, Nova Scotian Craig Jaret Hutchinson decided a baby would heal the rift between him and his girlfriend.
There was a slight problem, however. His girlfriend didn’t want to have his child.
So when the Halifax woman learned she was pregnant in September 2006, she was “shocked.” Hutchinson, on the other hand, was thrilled.
He later confessed that he had poked holes in their condoms with a pin in order to intentionally get her pregnant.

Horrified, his girlfriend called the police. She later had an abortion and suffered a uterine infection as a result that had to be treated with antibiotics.
The 42-year-old man was charged with aggravated sexual assault. Though he was acquitted in 2009, the decision was overturned and after a subsequent retrial he was sentenced to 18 months in jail.
Hutchinson appealed the decision, as CBC notes, arguing that the sex was consensual and that his sentence was “harsh and excessive.”
His case went all the way to Nova Scotia’s Court of Appeal, which released a 4-1 majority decision on Thursday to uphold the sentence.
The moral questions involved in this case are clear: Hutchinson’s actions were appalling.
The legal questions, on the other hand, have sparked much debate.
As the National Post reports, Chief Justice Michael MacDonald articulated the majority court decision that the alleged victim must be “fully aware of the exact nature of the proposed sexual activity.”
Under the Canadian Criminal Code, sex without consent is considered assault. Because the woman — identified as N.S. to protect her identity — only gave her consent for protected sex with the intention to avoid conception, the court qualified Hutchinson’s actions as sexual assault.

The Court’s one dissenting voice, Justice David Farrar, expressed concern that this decision would create a “potential slippery slope” for women who stop taking birth control and get pregnant without their partner’s knowledge or consent.
“Expanding criminal liability in this way would represent a dramatic step backwards,” writes Justice Farrar.
However, Justice MacDonald countered that because pregnancy carries far greater consequences for the mother than the father, should the gender roles be reversed, the circumstances would not fit the same definition of assault.
It’s an argument that, while biologically correct, may not fully take into account the significant emotional and financial toll for the unwitting father of a child conceived under duplicitous circumstances.
On the other hand, the idea that men like Hutchinson may think they can legally get away with poking holes in condoms, potentially causing pregnancy or the spread of STDs, is a truly terrifying thought.
Meanwhile, Farrar’s dissenting opinion gives Hutchinson’s lawyer the option to take his case to the Supreme Court. So far no decision has been made in that regard.

The light at the end of the tunnel. Reproductive equality.

The Fempocalypse is upon us folks.. the ability to own your destiny is at hand. Reproductive rights for men within sight!

For too long men have been subject to the whims of women determining the fates of men and using the power of the state to compel men to become parents before they are ready. Women have held the aces since the dawn of the pill and Roe vs. Wade. Women’s casual promiscuity up until then carried real consequences for abdicating their roles as the ultimate gatekeepers. They had the final say in whether sex took place or not because they carried the burden of pregnancy. The pill alleviated it to allow for near risk free fucking. Legalized abortion was the get out of jail free card.

As i stated before in my previous post regarding abortion feminism fought for the rights of women to avoid the natural consequences of sex and allowed women to escape a possible life of hardship or broken dreams by siring a child when ill prepared. It did not matter that women inherently know the ultimate burden fell on them, they wanted the right to fuck like men and enjoy sex wantonly, to which i have no problem with (if you’re giving it up, i wan’t some). Women’s evolutionary roles of guarding the gates and screening only for the best mate for genes, resource gathering and sticking around to provide and protect the offspring went the way of the 8-track and floppy disks because the evolutionary consequence of sex (having something grow inside you for 9 months) were wiped off the risk chart with a thick blob of liquid paper.

Pregnant? What do you mean? I’m a girl.. i can’t get pregnant! Thank god for feminism!

But when the tables are turned, there is no end to the amount of man up shaming and take responsibility for your kid rhetoric that comes towards a man who is following his evolutionary drive to ‘fuck like a man‘. Remember, this is a man’s primary purpose in biology, since the dawn of our species his role has been to fuck and carry his genes forward and continue his lineage. The fact that our evolution of society has outpaced our evolution caveman biology is the only reason we are in the shit state that we are in. It is our societal and cultural evolution that shames men for acting on our primary programming.

Women are encouraged to fuck freely, cast of the shackles of patriarchal sexual oppression and liberate their vagina’s to explore as many cocks as possible. And i wouldn’t mind, so long as i get a piece of that action 🙂 but the killer here is that women in today’s culture are cast as empowered and the hero of the story. Women are supposed to enjoy all the fruits of being a healthy sexual being unencumbered and uninhibited. It’s Sex and the City on steroids.

Contrast that in sharp relief to what men deal with today. Those fortunate enough to be in the top percentile  of the Pareto_principle who have women throwing themselves on their cocks feast on it, the rest live in suffering silence, a sexual drought. Yet all men are cast in the same light. “All men think with their dicks” they say. “Men are just horndogs, you should want a woman for her brains, not just her pussy” they say. “All they ever want is sex, disgusting animals all of them are” they say. One might say this is projection at it’s absolute zenith.

Yohami writes an absolutely wonderful evisceration of this kind of thinking here with regards to approach anxiety.

“Men are trained to be ashamed of their sexual desires.”

and

“It’s interesting that in comparison, women are trained that they should be put on a pedestal, and to take care of their “apparent” sexual desire, to look more slutty or more chaste… Or, I dont think I have heard a “woman, you should be ashamed of your sexual desires”.

So this all comes back full circle. Women want to behave like men and have all the options to avoid the responsibility that comes with those actions, but men acting as men do naturally, well that’s criminal.