Archive for the ‘MensRights’ Category

h1

Revenge Porn is Wrong – ABR is Not!

February 2, 2014

Just a quick post.  (quick by my standards anyways..)

453745872_640

I’m going to break ranks with a lot of folks in the sphere but whatever.. it’s how i roll.

First read this.

Victims Of ‘Revenge Porn’ Open Up On Reddit About How It Impacted Their Lives

I know a lot of people within our little community are against criminalization of it.. i am not one of them.

I happen to agree with it.

You see, I am a libertarian first and foremost. I value privacy and trust.

I happen to agree with the punishment aspect… consensual intimate affairs should not become dirty laundry to use as a weapon.
Being filmed while having sex that is not meant for public consumption, only private viewing between the two participants means there is an unwritten rule. It is merely for the two of you to enjoy and share with each other. It takes a hell of a lot of trust and enhances intimacy by leaps and bounds! It’s a trust that should not be violated. EVER.
You see, I enjoy creating porn with the women of my life. I’ve a small but fun collection of previous ex’s. I do not share them with anyone, even my newest partner. And I fully  intend to make home porn with her too, i didn’t buy a $1,000 camera just to take pictures of birds hehe. It’s a 24 megapixel, 1080p fully configurable, soft focus, low aperture, high depth of field glory machine! This is something i enjoy doing, and it takes an incredible amount of trust on my partners part to do that and i don’t want some fucking immature yahoo’s fucking up what is a very good thing for me. I like creating great sexual memories..
..and if it takes legal punishment to safeguard the fun of making home porn with your significant other, then so be it.
Some obvious disclaimers:
  • only subject yourself to this activity within the confines of a trusting monogamous relationship between mature people
  • DO NOT start sexting and sending xxx videos to the guy you hooked up with just days ago
  • DO NOT start making porn with stupid horny teens who act on emotion rather than rationality
  • etc..

There is only ONE time i will accept the idea of revenge porn, and it goes hand in hand with the acronym ABR, What is ABR?

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

If ABC and 20/20 Were a Print Publication…

October 21, 2013

ABC

That’s pretty much my feeling on their journalistic integrity on the matter.

Matt Forney covers every aspect of this in depth HERE

I would be reticent to mention this will be the second time i bring up Reagan and the revocation of ‘the fairness doctrine’ and the Supreme Courts ruling that ‘NEWS’ outlets are not required to tell factually accurate or truthful stories. I raised this during the run up to the Iraq war when FAUX newz was selling us drones of death and Saddams links to Al-Quada. If the news isn’t required to balance stories or give a shit about the truth, and everyone is in a race to the bottom for ratings instead of accuracy.. well..

you end up with the National Enquirer mindset. Pump out pure bullshit.. the American consumer will buy anything.

As if you didn’t hear me complain about that already

*image created by me, M3. Feel free to use.

h1

False Accusers Should Dragged Into The Street and Publicly Beaten

October 18, 2013

Update: The police have made a statement saying Rachel Cassidy was falsely identified, no word yet on the real name of the false accuser. Will be waiting with bated breath for that.

++

[And i’m back. I apologize for my absence. I had what i’ll call a “Murphy Week” in late Aug / early Sept where everything that could go wrong was going wrong. That was compounded by me having a ‘medical emergency’ dealing with my ticker, of which might be nothing or everything, depending on my test results with my cardiologist next Wednesday. Suffice to say, i didn’t feel like writing and wanted to stay away from the sphere as far as possible. No need reading about how horrible and shitty N.A. women are day in and out and writing shit about it either. Life felt too short so i wanted to disappear. I was going to write a sort of farewell post after my results came in, stating my absence and the fact that demands in my life are eating up my time and blogging seriously took a hit. Would i give up blogging altogether? Perhaps.. or just post extremely rarely and go back to being a commenter. As far as i was concerned, my catharsis was complete, i set out on my blog journey and came out exactly as i desired to be. A redpill man who shared his experiences on the way there and got the outcome he wanted, with a big fuck you to feminism to boot. There wasn’t much left for me to say that others couldn’t say better than me. So i was prepared to leave. That changed today when i read the following event on my Facebook feed. I simply lost it. Just to let you all know, my prior misery stemmed from things like my brothers absence, the loss of my dog, etc.. emotional things. As to how i conduct my life, i am still very happy in that regard. My relationship with my girl is better than ever so no concerns there either. Now, onto my rage rant.]

A Question for You.

2 people stand in front of you. 1 man. 1 woman. The woman says ‘He stole my umbrella!’. The man says ‘No i did not.’.. you look a the man and you see he is holding an umbrella behind his back. Is he guilty?

Perhaps. You clearly see the umbrella so you know the claim may have merit. So what do you do? Lock him up?

No, you ask him if he has a receipt or proof of ownership. If he produces it, you go back to the woman and ask if she can do the same. If she cannot, she is lying. Switch who has the receipt and she was honest and he is a criminal.

We call this investigation. We call it due process. And we do not arbitrarily remove the mans liberty simply based on the word of a person.

It is the cornerstone of justice.

Now imagine the same situation, but you do not see the man holding an umbrella at all. No other information is present. She says he stole it. He says he didn’t.

If the base assumption is that no one ever lies or risks putting themselves into a position to be scrutinized or challenged, then you have a dilemma on your hands if you have to start with ‘The accuser is always telling the truth, the accused is always guilty’ don’t you?

And i saw too much of that kind of mental midgetry today.

I’ve had enough. Enough of the bullshit.

I don’t care if this pisses off anyone, i just have to finally come out and say enough is enough. I don’t care if this goes viral. I want this front page, and i don’t care if Jizzabel, Femcuntfisting or the FatManwithBoobs comes after me. Let them.

I’ve had enough with a world that try’s to remove the essence of justice. That attempts to install a totalitarian way of thinking, that removes rights and liberties and treats the innocent as guilty, a world that operates on belief and not evidence.

Every bit of my Atheistic core is driven to rage because i’m seeing a carbon copy of what Christopher Hitchens derided religion for acting out before me with the Ohio ‘rape’ scandal and the woman being eaten out in public view.

And i cannot tolerate it any longer.

The assumption that no woman lies. That no woman would subject herself to that. That we must remove critical thinking and act without evidence or in contravenance to the evidence before us. That we must simply take it on faith that 100% of accusations of rape are real, with no evidence required and the need for trial a formality. He has been accused, it is enough to simply put him in the stockade, trial be damned.

FUCK YOU! To quote the Hitch “HOW DARE YOU!”

No i won’t tolerate it anymore.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Reproductive Slavery

June 13, 2013

Not my words..

slavery

From the Article

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/12/plan-b-for-all-girls-science-finally-trumps-politics/?intcmp=obinsite

Now don’t get me wrong here.. i have no issue with Plan B. I have no moral opposition to it on any religious grounds (hold up hand… Atheist!). Might it encourage promiscuity? Who knows.. i see it as no different than regular birth control that’s already available for kids. It’s just another option.

But here’s the real reason why this caught my eye. Slavery is an apt term. We educate kids about using birth control because duh duh duh.. kids being kids, will find a way to have sex. They are biologically programmed to do it. We might use knowledge, education or boogeyman scare tactics to dissuade them from having sex.. but it will happen.

The pill was created as a means to not make women become mothers before they were ready, before their time.

So i have no moral disagreement with Plan B.

I want to know where is the male version of Plan B.

I want to know where men go to avoid being slaves of reproduction.

And i want to hear something other then.. “Keep it in your pants”. Because i will punch you in the fucking face if you do.

The article frames it as it’s shown in the photo above, i have taken the liberty to modify it as how it’s actually intended to be interpreted by them:

“If a young girl is sexually active, whether by choice or not, she should not be denied reproductive rights. She should be allowed to make timely reproductive decisions about her own body within the dictates of her religious and moral codes.

To deny young adolescents GIRLS ONLY access to medically necessary and proven care is essentially reproductive slavery.”

We don’t want to make girls slaves to the responsibilities of their own choices to have sex.

But men who chose to have sex and accidentally knock a girl up…

Ball-and-chain

It’s a lifetime of child support for you, now get cracking SLAVE!

RELATED:

h1

The light at the end of the tunnel. Reproductive equality.

h1

Once more with feeling re: Abortion

h1

I don’t think women care that much about mens concerns

h1

Call for Heroes

May 30, 2013

I know i’m not posting as often as i should (or as often as i’d like to.. life gets in the way) but i’m making a personal plea here.

Doesn’t matter which side of the divide you’re on. I know many PUA’s don’t get along with MRA’s don’t get along with MGTOW’s don’t get along with TradCons don’t get along with The Kitchen Sink… but you get the drift.

A Voice for Men wrote up a great summation of what is on the line here with fascist femcunts have in store. Truly if you believe this is simply about crude offensive vulgar and detestable rape jokes and only that.. you’re in for a world of hurt. This is their first major offensive to do something about the SPHERE, it’s influence and their inability to shut up or silence their critics through calls of misogyny or socially conditioned mangina white knight brigade. Enough men have woken up and can’t be stopped. The power of the internet folks.

This is feminism’s last gasp at controlling the narrative! They have thus far failed to silence the continued onslaught of redpill awkenings at an exponential rate (one need only see the comment threads of any media outlet that is not moderated to death by the scared and timid tit mice of feminist leanings to see the explosion of rep pill knowledge being used to debunk fem-centric solipsistic garbage that would normally permeate throughout a docile and ignorant bluepill society), and without any ability to argue their points with any logic or rationality, seek to criminalize the thought and it’s control the delivery mechanism.

This is not about rape jokes or violent disgusting language. It’s about taking out A Voice for Men on Facebook for starters. Then it will go after people like Matt Forney, Roosh, and any other sphere persona who has decided to make their presence felt on Facebook. It will then go after the multitude of pages dedicated to spreading knowledge of feminism’s innate misandry, such as GirlWritesWhat(already target of YouTube DMCA take-down harassment) Humanists Against Feminism, Anti-Feminism, Exposing Feminism and the much loved AntiWhiteKnightBrigade.

It won’t stop until they control the medium so only their dogma can go unchallenged, making their echo chamber sound as if it is the only uncontested and unmolested voice on the internet. Goebbels would be proud.

I implore you, if you have a Facebook account, make your voice heard here: https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-safety/controversial-harmful-and-hateful-speech-on-facebook/574430655911054

Do not let these parasites have the final say on what is allowed. If they win here.. what will stop them from going after your YouTube channels? Lobbying Google to drop you from search?

Putting a gag in your mouth, disappearing you, and pretending to the world that everyone agrees with them because there are no dissenting voices?

This is your time to stand.

It’s your time to be a hero. Ready to answer the call?

“As a Libertarian.. this shit sickens me. Keep all speech out in the open, where it can be judged, criticized, argued, debated and see if it can withstand public scrutiny. Getting rid of something because you’re feelings are hurt doesn’t stop the problem, it only drives it into the shadows where it can fester. Speech should be encouraged out into daylight for all to see. That’s why i would never take away a rad-fem’s right to speak. They do such a good job of hanging themselves on their own words and show the world just how batshit crazy they are! U of T protest anyone?”

M3

Related: http://gigaom.com/2013/05/29/do-we-really-want-facebook-to-decide-what-qualifies-as-hate-speech-and-what-doesnt/

h1

Fully aware of the exact nature of the proposed sexual activity

January 9, 2013

That’s the language used. This shall become VERY interesting.

I have new stuff coming soon, but i couldn’t let this one pass up. No time to make a detailed post, just my emphasis in bold. The plot thickens…

Link Here

[update:] now that i have a little extra time to devote to this, to any new readers of this post i want them to fixate on this particular comment

“..only gave her consent for protected sex with the intention to avoid conception, the court qualified Hutchinson’s actions as sexual assault.”

and then consider this, this and this after you’ve read the Yahoo post. Comments welcome.

Craig Jaret Hutchinson who poked holes in girlfriend’s condoms loses court appeal

When their relationship started to go sour, Nova Scotian Craig Jaret Hutchinson decided a baby would heal the rift between him and his girlfriend.
There was a slight problem, however. His girlfriend didn’t want to have his child.
So when the Halifax woman learned she was pregnant in September 2006, she was “shocked.” Hutchinson, on the other hand, was thrilled.
He later confessed that he had poked holes in their condoms with a pin in order to intentionally get her pregnant.

Horrified, his girlfriend called the police. She later had an abortion and suffered a uterine infection as a result that had to be treated with antibiotics.
The 42-year-old man was charged with aggravated sexual assault. Though he was acquitted in 2009, the decision was overturned and after a subsequent retrial he was sentenced to 18 months in jail.
Hutchinson appealed the decision, as CBC notes, arguing that the sex was consensual and that his sentence was “harsh and excessive.”
His case went all the way to Nova Scotia’s Court of Appeal, which released a 4-1 majority decision on Thursday to uphold the sentence.
The moral questions involved in this case are clear: Hutchinson’s actions were appalling.
The legal questions, on the other hand, have sparked much debate.
As the National Post reports, Chief Justice Michael MacDonald articulated the majority court decision that the alleged victim must be “fully aware of the exact nature of the proposed sexual activity.”
Under the Canadian Criminal Code, sex without consent is considered assault. Because the woman — identified as N.S. to protect her identity — only gave her consent for protected sex with the intention to avoid conception, the court qualified Hutchinson’s actions as sexual assault.

The Court’s one dissenting voice, Justice David Farrar, expressed concern that this decision would create a “potential slippery slope” for women who stop taking birth control and get pregnant without their partner’s knowledge or consent.
“Expanding criminal liability in this way would represent a dramatic step backwards,” writes Justice Farrar.
However, Justice MacDonald countered that because pregnancy carries far greater consequences for the mother than the father, should the gender roles be reversed, the circumstances would not fit the same definition of assault.
It’s an argument that, while biologically correct, may not fully take into account the significant emotional and financial toll for the unwitting father of a child conceived under duplicitous circumstances.
On the other hand, the idea that men like Hutchinson may think they can legally get away with poking holes in condoms, potentially causing pregnancy or the spread of STDs, is a truly terrifying thought.
Meanwhile, Farrar’s dissenting opinion gives Hutchinson’s lawyer the option to take his case to the Supreme Court. So far no decision has been made in that regard.

h1

Open Letter To An Unnamed Woman

December 13, 2012

A fellow Torontonian shows much more restraint and understanding than i would. If she pulled that on me, she’d probably be waking up this week.

Remarkable restraint in the face of pure hatred.. dare i say pure evil. Kudos to him. This woman needs to be outted publicly. Holy hell i can’t even believe she holds any educational position at a revered institution such as U of T. Personally, i think ‘womens studies’ should be dismantled. You might as well have the KKK tenure there teaching racial and cultural tolerance classes.

22to28 :: Don't screw up

Dear Ma’am,

I’m pretty sure that you know who I am, as we recently met informally at an event where Warren Farrell was speaking. Just in case it has slipped your mind, we have our own Youtube video.

If you are reading this, I’d like to start out by saying the following: while it is hard for me to believe that you want it, I want you to know that you have my forgiveness. I don’t doubt for one moment that you meant everything that you said to me that night. I have no doubt that you intended to be as hurtful as possible. I’m not giving you a pass by assuming that you were having a bad moment or that you were overcome by emotion and said something you didn’t mean.

I know you meant what you said and that you probably still do. But, I forgive you regardless. I’m…

View original post 1,187 more words