“Fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this battle station.”
Grand Moff Wilhuff Tarkin
The Tarkin Doctrine
Fear is what keeps people in line. It’s why abusers do what they do. The person with power asserts it over the one who has none. I just had a conversation with a guy on facebook who’s wife want’s ‘some space’. She’s asserting her power over a man who is too terrified of the prospect of losing her. He would take any type of abuse in order to hold on. I told him “Why would she respect you when it’s obvious you don’t have any respect for yourself?” Hopefully he takes my advise and tells her they are separating. If she accepts easily, he gets his answer that it was over long ago. If she reconsiders and starts pleading or negotiating, at least he gets to discuss from his feet and not from his knees.
But there is another kind of abuse done out of fear. The ones perpetuated by those with the most to lose in a situation, and an inability to control the circumstances around them.
The wall is something most women have to look forward to and deal with. Always have, always will. Tho back in the day, it was mitigated by a whole host of factors before feminism came sweeping in with such bullshit tropes as people being attracted to others minds over physical markers of beauty and health.
Sheer projection. Women always crafted attraction of men based on how men behave, how well read they are, how intelligent they are, savvy and suave.. masters of their interactions. Personality is 80% of attraction wrt to what attracts women to men. This does not hold in reverse for men.
So as i was saying, back in the day, women avoided the perils of the wall by doing a number of mitigating things. We called this period ‘Patriarchy’ … lol. No, but we did call it Pre-Feminism. A period where mothers and grandmothers taught their daughters the reality of how to behave and what to do with the best of intentions to make sure they secured the best possible life for them and the overall growing family.
- They married at the height of their SMV to secure the best man possible.
- They were taught to seek out good quality provider and protector men, and warned not to succumb to the wiles of cads who would not stay and leave them to bear children in poverty.
- They were taught not to be a slut or a whore as it would lower her value in the eyes of prospective bachelors
- They gave men of 1-2 points less SMV a valid shot at courtship to show their true quality and potential growth vectors
- They were told that men would ‘grow’ into their higher value as they aged and became more wise and knowledgeable.
- They knew as they aged and got older, their own looks would fade while their husbands SMV would rise, thus balancing out the initial SMV disparity
- They knew by seeing their parents that loving bonds formed early in life when at their most attractive peak carried on in loving memories by the husband for the wife of his youth.
Alimony was created to help keep women who made that great sacrifice early on (their youth and fertility, their help to raise the family, their support of the husband in his career advancement.. all at the cost of her own future should he leave) to keep her from being penalized for putting all her eggs in a shitty basket. A penalty bestowed upon a man who took a woman gift of youth and traded it up after years of dutiful service and support of the husband.
That was then.. this is now. A time now when women are encouraged to slut around with zero apparent repercussions in a culture that gorges on pretty lies. Hypergamy gone wild. Female mating interests and selection altered by the pill. Daddy government to provide, no need for men. Jobs and income creating independence from men, higher education and status, driving hypergamic expectations beyond the stratosphere. All driven by feminism. Driven away from the divine knowledge of the women of yesterday.. driven into madness.
Feminism told them many wrong things that have now turned many women into fearful creatures that will lash out in all directions because of that fear.
I present to you Melanie Sykes
I will give credit where credit is due. At 43, she looks very good at her age.
“They say time is the fire in which we burn. Right now, Captain, my time is running out.”
But she’s not 23.
And she knows it.
And she’s frightened.
Her time is running out, especially when juxtaposed next to her 23 year old lover-boy toy. He will soon reach a moment where his SMV drastically rises beyond what it already is, while hers will begin to plummet rapidly. And she has no control over any of it as she begins to conceptualize a life without power and a life after her 5 minutes of Alpha.
The horses are about to flee the barn, never to return.
She’s 43 and about to hit a wall (a wall that has been postponed miraculously through genetics, personal trainers, and her media/celebrity elevated position) that no amount of botox, oil of olay or surgery will prevent from her from hitting. She’s ridden on her looks as far as she could take that train ride. For all intents and purposes, she’s been enjoying the company of a 23 year old male gigolo, an alpha stallion.. a true euphemism for riding the cock carousel.
She knows that moment is coming. It’s not a matter of if, but when.
And the kicker?
They’re married, it will be interesting to see if alimony works in reverse and he gets his payday! It’s equality right? How much could he possibly make compared to her? The possibility of a Frivorce, leaving her for someone younger, and collecting her cash and prizes, and leaving her to begin entertaining either extremely old men she can’t stomach, or continue being a pump and dump to the stars who will enjoy a night with her, but will look towards younger starlets to wife up.
Fear. The one in the relationship that has the most to lose fears the most. Insecurity breeds fear.
It’ s easy to conceive of a million arguments that could have precipitated the reason why she ended up assaulting him. Billy from RoK says it’s by calling her a Slut, and i’d rightly agree. But another vector is to be the proverbial mirror, and remind a woman of the deep dark truth, as a mirror would.. that without a lifetime of memories to put ‘wife goggles’ on a man.. an old aged woman is just that. Old. And aged. And all the men she would like to settle down with, will all be looking 5 to 10 years beneath her.
If only she had a mother of patriarchy to guide her.
She had the entire first half of her life having all the power. Now she will watch as it begins to slip away. Is It Fair? Evolution seems to think so.
Now i might be picking on an extreme case of age disparity but it still amounts to the same principle in action. Everything that can be said about her relationship with her boytoy can be overlaid on some of the current Sex and the City couplings out there.
Today women are setting themselves up for disaster. Age and SMV disparity of epic proportions leave women in fear of their insecurity that they will be left for someone younger as they will already be in advanced age entering the ‘commitment zone/marriage’. They will also be making enough for alimony to now be claimed by men.
Welcome to the future.
This is a feminist future and nightmare.