So, some time ago i decided to be a smartass and tell the world i was reading ‘the Game’. It was on my Assbook, my TUMBLR, this blog, on a billboard downtown and on OKCupid.
Well, maybe not the billboard.
In any case, one day one of the women i politely asked to chat with in a non cut&paste manner previewed my profile before responding and noticed that i had written in ‘The Most Private Thing I’m Willing To Admit’ box was that i was currently reading the book. Here’s the extremely quick chat we had.
Preconceptions and an inability to argue beyond emotional hysterics. This is where conversations go to die.
I have another post in the works about a trend i’m noticing online, and how women talk in the real world as well. About how they’re ‘tired of the games’ or ‘guys are assholes’. It’s the Chicks Dig Jerks syndrome of course.
And they’re starting to blame it on ‘Game’ because it is starting to go mainstream. Fuck, i even saw an episode of Criminal Minds not too long ago where they were investigating someone who was running ‘Pick Up’ training, and the killer took one of his courses on the dark arts. Of course the actor they chose looked like a sleezeball and slimey (had to get your digs in MSM) but it shows that Game and PickUp are becoming part of the mainstream narrative. More and more women are becoming aware that men are learning and reading about how to seduce women and are becoming frightened by the thought.
You’d think women would love the chance to have MOAR alpha men to choose from to satiate their hypergamous sexholes need for top dog sausage.
Almost paradoxically, the more alpha’s that enter the system, in the minds of women.. DILUTE the prize of becoming the prize pig to an alpha. What is the victory in shackling one down when they’re a dime a dozen? It’s like currency. Flooding the economy with more printed money and what do you get? People buying bread with wheel-barrels full of paper. Women don’t want to wheel around dump trucks full of useless kindling.
BUT WAIT, it gets even better!
Women are starting to also catch on to the fact that PUA’s, while maybe not having been naturals, seem indistinguishable. Yes the bad ones have certain tells, but the good PUA’s.. you don’t know it until they’re asking you kindly to leave their flat while throwing your clothes out the door and saying thanks for the lay. Another one for the pump and dump files. They are scared of ceding control, of losing the ability to make t-shirts that say ‘I have the pussy, I make the rules’.
Others who won’t bother to become hardcore PUA’s will still nonetheless learn how to react with dignity and not to be a pussy beggar, thus ending the free ride of so many entitled mooching whores. These men will not bend or yield as they force women to qualify to them and reject outright the batshit crazy, the entitled princess, the narcissist attention whore, the beta-orbiter collector. As was pointed out to me by both my brother and Leap of Beta, even learning to withhold the act of surrender-commitment is a huge game-changer IF enough men learn this concept and enforce it.
The point i’m driving at is that women want to paint Game as some evil entity and that your association to it in ANY WAY marks you as a villainous user of women (as if that isn’t just female imperative with gender reversal). What they fail to grasp is that Game isn’t moral, it’s amoral. Game itself is unaware AND indifferent to questions of right or wrong. It doesn’t care! (like Hypergamy)
Over at Dalrocks, guest blogger Cane Caldo touches upon the symbiotic and inverse relationship of Game/Hypergamy on his post Cypher’s Dilemma.
What is Game? Here’s the definition, as I understand it:
Game is the applied science of attraction, most commonly expressed as the art of seduction. It’s based on the supposed evolutionary psychology of human; with a special emphasis on exploiting the condition of hypergamy.
Hypergamy is a philosophy of the condition of women that says, whenever possible, any given woman will choose to mate with the male in her vicinity that is exhibiting the most, and most dominant, sexual traits. Those sexual traits, themselves, are Game.
It’s a really good read, but it devolves into moralizing about why Game is bad/wrong/not necessary for Christians. To each their own, but i think he’s missing a key point that Dalrock got. It’s not game that’s evil.. it’s how the practitioner decides to use Game.
Maybe this graphic will help.
Everything pictured here can kill. EVERYTHING.
Game is a Tool.
Read the rest of this entry ?