Posts Tagged ‘mens.rights’

h1

Odds, Ends, Thoughts, Musings, Reflections and Other Stuff

July 27, 2013

Questions Part 2 will take a back seat for a day or two or more, depending on how i feel. It’s ready to go, but i feel i need to get some things off my chest first before i release it.

1. Commenter Ariel left a comment here on my last post, a comment i can’t really place as to whether she was angry about that specific post, or talking about another post and she accidentally cross posted the comment. The comment was all over the map and it felt out of place. In any case i simply wanted to understand the proper context of the comment and mention the following, unless she’s commenting about my whole blog in generel.  Ariel wrote:

“What happened to you? You are happy. You have love. You … Have a women who you hold in high esteem and bask in her reciprocation of this heavenly emotion”

I still am wondrously happy with a woman i adore. There is an aura of love, adoration and caring. I am the masculine to her feminine. I do hold her in high esteem and cherish the reciprocation. She looks up to me and respects my wit, intelligence, deep logic and dedication to building a body she simply loves to ravish. All of it true.

This does not change the fact that i write a blog for men (and women) under the aspect of helping blue pill men and guiding them into the red, and help women understand there are consequences to actions and behaviors, and try to steer them to avoid those bad behaviors where possible and enhance the good ones wherever possible. If a strong, sexy, dominant, knows what he wants, takes no shit redpill man is what you want.. then you need to accept redpill thinking from men. I write about my experiences. I write about what i find appropriate and inappropriate. I don’t tell anyone what they should do in life, i tell them what *I* think. I do not put a gun to men’s heads and say “You have to do this or that!”, I promote my ideals in the free marketplace of idea’s where they will either be adopted by men, or they won’t. If enough men think that what i’m saying sounds good and act on it.. it’s not for you to say “You promote hate against sluts and your generalizations are all wrong and STFU and keep quiet because you poison people”. What you must do is introduce your own idea’s.. and if they are sound and reasonable, people will adopt your ideals over mine.

That’s how the free market works. Offer the men a better choice, and they will take it.

“You lost me.”

I’m sorry that’s the way you feel. I’d rather you stayed to discuss and debate seeing as how i enjoy having women bring their point of view to my table, but it’s ultimately your choice. I’m not going to stop promoting the idea that a world with fewer sluts is good thing for civilization. I’m not going to stop trying to dissuade an impressionable young women from jumping on the carousel because i believe many men, myself included, prize a women who treated her sexuality like a gift to be shared respectfully with only men who proved themselves to be of utmost value.. not something to be frittered away to just those who would use her as a warm masturbatory tool. I’m not going to stop telling severely overweight people to expect high physical SMV beauty in their partner that they’re unable to work for in themselves. I’m not going to stop cluing women into the reality of the wall and to prioritize marriage and children over partying and careers. I’m not going to stop being the boogyman who warns of future spinsterhood to women who ape masculine traits they adore that men do not adore in women. I’m not going to indulge women in the unrealistic idea of having it all.

I can never have it all, but i did the hard work and looked inward to make the most of the situation and the time i have left. Just because i’m riding a high now does not mean i’ll shutter up the blog, silence my voice and stop telling guys in less fortunate situations what i think they should aspire for instead of settling for what the femcentric society tells them they should accept. I’m not going to abandon them just because i left the ghetto for the gated community…

I haven’t forgotten where i came from.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Reproductive Slavery

June 13, 2013

Not my words..

slavery

From the Article

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/12/plan-b-for-all-girls-science-finally-trumps-politics/?intcmp=obinsite

Now don’t get me wrong here.. i have no issue with Plan B. I have no moral opposition to it on any religious grounds (hold up hand… Atheist!). Might it encourage promiscuity? Who knows.. i see it as no different than regular birth control that’s already available for kids. It’s just another option.

But here’s the real reason why this caught my eye. Slavery is an apt term. We educate kids about using birth control because duh duh duh.. kids being kids, will find a way to have sex. They are biologically programmed to do it. We might use knowledge, education or boogeyman scare tactics to dissuade them from having sex.. but it will happen.

The pill was created as a means to not make women become mothers before they were ready, before their time.

So i have no moral disagreement with Plan B.

I want to know where is the male version of Plan B.

I want to know where men go to avoid being slaves of reproduction.

And i want to hear something other then.. “Keep it in your pants”. Because i will punch you in the fucking face if you do.

The article frames it as it’s shown in the photo above, i have taken the liberty to modify it as how it’s actually intended to be interpreted by them:

“If a young girl is sexually active, whether by choice or not, she should not be denied reproductive rights. She should be allowed to make timely reproductive decisions about her own body within the dictates of her religious and moral codes.

To deny young adolescents GIRLS ONLY access to medically necessary and proven care is essentially reproductive slavery.”

We don’t want to make girls slaves to the responsibilities of their own choices to have sex.

But men who chose to have sex and accidentally knock a girl up…

Ball-and-chain

It’s a lifetime of child support for you, now get cracking SLAVE!

RELATED:

h1

The light at the end of the tunnel. Reproductive equality.

h1

Once more with feeling re: Abortion

h1

I don’t think women care that much about mens concerns

h1

Call for Heroes

May 30, 2013

I know i’m not posting as often as i should (or as often as i’d like to.. life gets in the way) but i’m making a personal plea here.

Doesn’t matter which side of the divide you’re on. I know many PUA’s don’t get along with MRA’s don’t get along with MGTOW’s don’t get along with TradCons don’t get along with The Kitchen Sink… but you get the drift.

A Voice for Men wrote up a great summation of what is on the line here with fascist femcunts have in store. Truly if you believe this is simply about crude offensive vulgar and detestable rape jokes and only that.. you’re in for a world of hurt. This is their first major offensive to do something about the SPHERE, it’s influence and their inability to shut up or silence their critics through calls of misogyny or socially conditioned mangina white knight brigade. Enough men have woken up and can’t be stopped. The power of the internet folks.

This is feminism’s last gasp at controlling the narrative! They have thus far failed to silence the continued onslaught of redpill awkenings at an exponential rate (one need only see the comment threads of any media outlet that is not moderated to death by the scared and timid tit mice of feminist leanings to see the explosion of rep pill knowledge being used to debunk fem-centric solipsistic garbage that would normally permeate throughout a docile and ignorant bluepill society), and without any ability to argue their points with any logic or rationality, seek to criminalize the thought and it’s control the delivery mechanism.

This is not about rape jokes or violent disgusting language. It’s about taking out A Voice for Men on Facebook for starters. Then it will go after people like Matt Forney, Roosh, and any other sphere persona who has decided to make their presence felt on Facebook. It will then go after the multitude of pages dedicated to spreading knowledge of feminism’s innate misandry, such as GirlWritesWhat(already target of YouTube DMCA take-down harassment) Humanists Against Feminism, Anti-Feminism, Exposing Feminism and the much loved AntiWhiteKnightBrigade.

It won’t stop until they control the medium so only their dogma can go unchallenged, making their echo chamber sound as if it is the only uncontested and unmolested voice on the internet. Goebbels would be proud.

I implore you, if you have a Facebook account, make your voice heard here: https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-safety/controversial-harmful-and-hateful-speech-on-facebook/574430655911054

Do not let these parasites have the final say on what is allowed. If they win here.. what will stop them from going after your YouTube channels? Lobbying Google to drop you from search?

Putting a gag in your mouth, disappearing you, and pretending to the world that everyone agrees with them because there are no dissenting voices?

This is your time to stand.

It’s your time to be a hero. Ready to answer the call?

“As a Libertarian.. this shit sickens me. Keep all speech out in the open, where it can be judged, criticized, argued, debated and see if it can withstand public scrutiny. Getting rid of something because you’re feelings are hurt doesn’t stop the problem, it only drives it into the shadows where it can fester. Speech should be encouraged out into daylight for all to see. That’s why i would never take away a rad-fem’s right to speak. They do such a good job of hanging themselves on their own words and show the world just how batshit crazy they are! U of T protest anyone?”

M3

Related: http://gigaom.com/2013/05/29/do-we-really-want-facebook-to-decide-what-qualifies-as-hate-speech-and-what-doesnt/

h1

Fully aware of the exact nature of the proposed sexual activity

January 9, 2013

That’s the language used. This shall become VERY interesting.

I have new stuff coming soon, but i couldn’t let this one pass up. No time to make a detailed post, just my emphasis in bold. The plot thickens…

Link Here

[update:] now that i have a little extra time to devote to this, to any new readers of this post i want them to fixate on this particular comment

“..only gave her consent for protected sex with the intention to avoid conception, the court qualified Hutchinson’s actions as sexual assault.”

and then consider this, this and this after you’ve read the Yahoo post. Comments welcome.

Craig Jaret Hutchinson who poked holes in girlfriend’s condoms loses court appeal

When their relationship started to go sour, Nova Scotian Craig Jaret Hutchinson decided a baby would heal the rift between him and his girlfriend.
There was a slight problem, however. His girlfriend didn’t want to have his child.
So when the Halifax woman learned she was pregnant in September 2006, she was “shocked.” Hutchinson, on the other hand, was thrilled.
He later confessed that he had poked holes in their condoms with a pin in order to intentionally get her pregnant.

Horrified, his girlfriend called the police. She later had an abortion and suffered a uterine infection as a result that had to be treated with antibiotics.
The 42-year-old man was charged with aggravated sexual assault. Though he was acquitted in 2009, the decision was overturned and after a subsequent retrial he was sentenced to 18 months in jail.
Hutchinson appealed the decision, as CBC notes, arguing that the sex was consensual and that his sentence was “harsh and excessive.”
His case went all the way to Nova Scotia’s Court of Appeal, which released a 4-1 majority decision on Thursday to uphold the sentence.
The moral questions involved in this case are clear: Hutchinson’s actions were appalling.
The legal questions, on the other hand, have sparked much debate.
As the National Post reports, Chief Justice Michael MacDonald articulated the majority court decision that the alleged victim must be “fully aware of the exact nature of the proposed sexual activity.”
Under the Canadian Criminal Code, sex without consent is considered assault. Because the woman — identified as N.S. to protect her identity — only gave her consent for protected sex with the intention to avoid conception, the court qualified Hutchinson’s actions as sexual assault.

The Court’s one dissenting voice, Justice David Farrar, expressed concern that this decision would create a “potential slippery slope” for women who stop taking birth control and get pregnant without their partner’s knowledge or consent.
“Expanding criminal liability in this way would represent a dramatic step backwards,” writes Justice Farrar.
However, Justice MacDonald countered that because pregnancy carries far greater consequences for the mother than the father, should the gender roles be reversed, the circumstances would not fit the same definition of assault.
It’s an argument that, while biologically correct, may not fully take into account the significant emotional and financial toll for the unwitting father of a child conceived under duplicitous circumstances.
On the other hand, the idea that men like Hutchinson may think they can legally get away with poking holes in condoms, potentially causing pregnancy or the spread of STDs, is a truly terrifying thought.
Meanwhile, Farrar’s dissenting opinion gives Hutchinson’s lawyer the option to take his case to the Supreme Court. So far no decision has been made in that regard.

h1

Another man bites the dust, but don’t forget to mention about women too.

August 29, 2012

Caught this on Global TV last night. I can’t embed the video so go to the link below and watch the clip.

See if you can spot the part that made me kinda spit a little beer out of my mouth. I’ll wait.

Click to go to video

Didn’t hear it? I’ll give you a clue. It happens at the 47 second mark when the constable is talking.

Did you notice the only female in this report is the reporter narrating?

Here’s the Toronto Sun report with a picture slideshow of the scene. Notice anything?

Some Canadian stats:

A recent 131-page report titled A Roadmap to Men’s Health, produced by a medical team from SFU, UBC and Vancouver General Hospital, found that men are the victims of more than 97 per cent of all Canadian workplace deaths. (article)

A Kanetix.ca insurance report entitled Jobs that can kill: Workplace fatalities in Canada by gender:

There were 1,097 Canadians killed at their place of work in 2005 according to a recent study by the Centre for the Study of Living Standards. When we take a look at who these people are, the gender trend is clear; the average rate of workplace deaths in Canada in 2005 was 30 times higher for men than women. In other words, 97 per cent of the people killed on the job were men. In actual numbers, of the 1097 reported workplace deaths in 2005, 1069 were male workers while the remaining 28 were female workers. The study also reports, the rate of workplace death is rising for men and falling for women. (article)

Some U.S. stats supplied by the beautiful Carolina in her smashing article Do Any Women Work at the Dirty, Difficult and Dangerous Jobs that Men Do? Any Women At All?

  • “In 2006, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor Stats, 5,396 men and 444 women were killed on the job. Women were only 7.5% of on-the-job fatalities.”
  • “And, btw, the 412 rescue workers who were killed in the 9/11 attacks were…all men.”
  • 99% of coal miners are men.*
  • 99% of garbage collectors are men.*
  • 100% of deep sea fishermen are men.
  • 100% of electrical power line installers are men.
  • 100% of roughnecks (work the oil drill) are men.
  • 99% of auto repair mechanics are men.*
  • 99% of roofers are men.*
  • 100% of heating, air conditioning and refrigeration mechanics are men.
  • 98% of metal fabricators are men.
  • 97% of aircraft maintenance and service technicians are men.
  • 95.5% of firefighters are men
  • 92% of construction workers are men.
  • 88% of patrol officers are men.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Fuckbot denounces Daniel Tosh

July 22, 2012

Saturday i went out to play paintball with the company i work for. It was awesome and i killed a ton of people. Then i came home and ate a sandwich. Then i felt my eyes get heavy. I was so tired and bruised i simply slipped into bed because it felt like i got smoked by a subway train.

oh shit..

***********TRIGGER WARNING!***********
[the preceding joke contains a reference to suicide by public transport. if you have yourself or any family/friends who have committed suicide by public transport vehicle, please avoid this page.. oh.. too late]

Sometimes it takes comedy and satire to really show the value of all comedy and satire, whether it offends you or not.

The boys of RedLetterMedia (who produced the epic Star Wars prequel trilogy reviews) decided to weigh in on the ‘rape joke‘ controversy  sparked by Daniel Tosh as only great comedians can.

Check it out for yourselves.

Now i absolutely love RedLetterMedia. If you watch all the Star Wars reviews, you’ll see it’s reviewed by a caricature called Mr. Plinkett.

Creepy pizza roll eating, serial woman abducting, ex wife killing, movie critic

Mr. Plinkett would not be able to exist if the forces that are going after Tosh were allowed to succeed. And that would be a fucking tragedy because i think Mr. Plinkett is pure comical genius. Again, i’m not asking you to take my word for it, i’d say go view it yourself HERE, HERE, and HERE, provided you give a shit about Star Wars. If you don’t.. well.. you’re dead to me.

Point is, these guys have a vested interest in defending Tosh and i happen to agree. That doesn’t make me or these guys rapist enablers.. nor are we adding to ‘rape culture’. Bah. I hate that BS term.

As i stated on many other blog comments, and now weighing in myself.. you don’t have to like the jokes a comedian is saying. You can get up and walk out in protest, stop listening, avoid the shows, vote with your feet and your wallet. You may think they’re the sickest jokes imaginable. You may think those who laugh at those jokes are terrible people. That’s your opinion.

But your opinion isn’t a right to prevent artists from creating their craft. No one has a right to not be offended. If you put a limit on one thing, where does the limit end?

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Reverse the genders of a story and what do you see?

June 28, 2012

Pictured: Engaged cheerleading coach, 22, ‘who performed sex act on teen basketball player in her car’

Pictures have emerged showing the cheerleading coach accused of performing oral sex on a 17-year-old student kissing her fiance and partying with friends ahead of her arrest.

Megan Crafton, 22, handed herself in to police on June 15 after the teenage boy, who was on the school basketball team, told officers about the liaison in the parking lot of a grocery store in January.

FULL STORY HERE

You know… someone wrote a post somewhere on the manosphere about this kind of behavior by female teachers, authority figures, etc.. not being an epidemic.

It might not be, but it’s becoming a helluva lot more frequent.

But that’s not the issue.

The issue is if it was a man instead of a woman.. feminists would be going wild, and the justice system would be coming down on his head, and the media would eviscerate him.

But a hot chick does it… well.. lucky boy.

Double standards, how i do love’m.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 177 other followers